I have something to say to the Bernie people who are still gnashing their teeth in lamentation over Hillary’s nomination. This is something I commented on a friend’s thread and have been meaning to post on my page, so I figured I’d paste it here with some additions:
RE: Anger at the Democratic Party for screwing over Bernie Sanders.
The fact of the matter is that the parties can select their candidates in whatever way they so choose; they’re not accounted for at all in the Constitution. Binding popular selection by the public via the primaries is actually a relatively recent development dating to the sixties. Before that it was basically the kind of backroom dealing among party bosses that I see a lot of people (mostly Bernie people) lamenting about today regarding Hillary’s nomination (see: Super Delegates).
My overall point is that Bernie chose to run as a Democrat…which actually probably enabled a higher profile for himself than he would have gotten if he had ran as the independent he’s always been throughout his career. But in running as a Democrat, he simultaneously ran into the “rigged” party system that was almost explicitly designed to keep someone like him out. Is it fair? No. Is it democracy? No. But we’re not even a true democracy as it is; we don’t even elect the president by direct popular vote. Undemocratic? Maybe, but in any case that’s how the Founders DESIGNED the system.
I guess the ultimate question Bernie followers need ask themselves now is, is the progressive movement (i.e., the policies Sanders’ espoused) in a better position overall now than if he hadn’t ran as a Democrat. Hillary was forced to pivot left in order to accommodate him. That’s something right there. You can say she’s lying to get votes, but Sanders’ profile is exponentially higher now and he could be in a position to influence things via the Senate if Hillary wins. Just a thought.
Oh, and who would you rather have choose the make up and character of the Supreme Court for the next generation? Chances are the next president will get to nominate as many as three or four new justices since so many current ones are in or are about to enter their 80s (to say nothing of the current empty seat that one particular party refuses to hold a hearing for). Roe V Wade, gay rights, voter laws, environmental laws, health care laws, gun rights…those worth giving over to Donald Trump just because you don’t feel like you were treated nicely enough by the DNC?